I’m tempering that pessimist on my shoulder…

I’m tempering that pessimist on my shoulder…

Where Innovation Meets Investing

It’s the closest thing to a “perfect” stock market indicator.

It’s reliably timed many market tops and bottoms.

And it’s hiding in plain sight.

Longtime RiskHedge readers know exactly what I’m talking about.

The “magazine cover” indicator...

In short: Pay attention to what popular magazine covers are saying. Then, do the exact opposite.

Let me show you what the latest cover is saying… and my top way to “play it.”

  • The Economist—one of the most widely read financial magazines in the world—has an almost supernatural ability to nail the tops and bottoms of MAJOR trends…

But not in a good way.

When The Economist writes a glowing cover story about a certain asset or country, it’s usually time to sell.

The opposite is also true.

The Economist thinks some investment is doomed? Time to buy.

Take these two Brazil-themed covers from 2009 and 2016:

The Economist was all bulled up on Brazil in 2009. If you bought the iShares’s Brazil ETF (EWZ) then, you lost roughly half of your money over the following five years.

You would have fared much better buying EWZ in 2016 when Brazil was supposed to be headed for a “disastrous year ahead.” In fact, this negative cover marked the exact bottom for Brazilian stocks.

And then there’s my all-time favorite magazine cover…

In October 2003, The Economist declared, “The end of the Oil Age.”

Oil was trading around $25/barrel at the time.

Oil then entered an all-time boom. The price of oil 5X’d over the next five years to a record $145/barrel.

You could have made five times your money betting against The Economist.

And these aren’t just “cherry-picked” examples…

  • Two Citibank analysts studied roughly 50 Economist covers from the past 25 years that covered an investing idea in either a positive or negative light.

They found 68% (!) of all covers were “wrong” one year after publication.

In fact, if you’d set up a system to trade against Economist covers, you would have outperformed most hedge fund managers.

Buying assets The Economist wrote negatively about would have returned 18% in profits over the following year, on average.

Shorting assets that appeared on a positive cover would have generated average returns of 8% over the next 12 months.

  • Why are magazine covers like The Economist such good contrarian indicators?

Folks usually pay attention to an asset only after it’s surged in price.

By the time it makes it to the front cover of The Economist, a majority of the move has likely already happened.

There are few buyers left to come in and drive prices higher. Meaning, we’re usually at the end—not the beginning—of a big runup.

And don’t forget: These journalists are just doing their jobs. They’re not investors. Most of the time, they write about what’s hot in the markets. That’s how you sell issues and subscriptions.

  • What’s in the magazine these days?

I currently live in Europe.

And I’m sad about its future.

The continent has become a museum for rich Americans to visit on summer vacations. Tech progress has essentially been outlawed here.

Europe’s economy was roughly the same size as America’s in 2008. Now, the US is almost twice as big!

I want my kids to grow up in a land of “strivers,” not in one that feels like Groundhog Day.

But I had to temper that pessimist on my shoulder when I saw The Economist’s latest cover: “Is Germany Once Again the Sick Man of Europe?”

The last time The Economist printed a bearish cover story on Europe was in July 2022. It suggested I would freeze to death due to a lack of Russian heating oil.

Spoiler: Europe didn’t turn into a giant ice cube.

And if you had bought the Vanguard European Stock Index Fund (VGK), which tracks companies in the major European markets, after seeing that cover…

You would have banked 23% profits over the next year. That’s better than the 18% gains US stocks handed out over the same period.

Now’s another good time to consider buying some VGK.

Stephen McBride
Chief Analyst, RiskHedge

In the mailbag…

Here’s what one RiskHedge reader had to say about Stephen’s recent guidance on Nvidia’s (NVDA) surging stock price:

“I appreciate you sharing your current assessment on what to do with Nvidia now.

Your original recommendation to buy was made before I connected with RiskHedge. As it happens, however, I picked up a little NVDA based on some information from elsewhere in January 2019. (Wish now I’d picked up a lot more, but was cautious.) I’ve been sitting tight since then and been contemplating recently how best to preserve the benefit I’ve gained.

I just sold enough to lock in a free ride, plus 100% on my original investment, leaving me with about 85% of my position still intact. (I almost sold it all but hesitated, thinking it’s a little too early in the push for the new AI chips.)

I’ve been thinking it makes sense for me to lock in the rest of my gains before it hits the next big drawdown, as I don’t have a long investing horizon. As you noted in your current article, the exuberance behind Cisco pushed it to a level it has never gotten back to.

Your perspectives have been helpful in my assessment of my current plan for this stock. I’m really glad you weighed in on this.

Thanks for the evaluation that was extremely timely for me!”—Jan

Suggested Reading...

Let's Connect!
Join our free online community

 

Why an MLP Doesn't
Belong in Your IRA




Join our community and get in on the discussion

Keep up with RiskHedge on the go.

Download the App

Scan it with your Phone